bridges_counterpoint:simple_counterpoint

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
bridges_counterpoint:simple_counterpoint [2017/07/27 12:06] brianbridges_counterpoint:simple_counterpoint [2018/01/18 19:46] (current) – minor typo brian
Line 143: Line 143:
  
 {{ :bridges_counterpoint:01-ex13.mp3 | :bridges_counterpoint:01-ex13.ogg |}} {{ :bridges_counterpoint:01-ex13.mp3 | :bridges_counterpoint:01-ex13.ogg |}}
 +
 +===== Musical Examples =====
  
 The following are examples of two-part counterpoint, first species: The following are examples of two-part counterpoint, first species:
Line 176: Line 178:
 ===== Observations on Examples 14-20 ===== ===== Observations on Examples 14-20 =====
  
-**Ex. 14**: The four bars at a answer the first four effectively, and the sequence at //b// is good. The sequential form of the counterpoint justifies the somewhat too frequent octaves.+**Ex. 14**: The four bars at //a// answer the first four effectively, and the sequence at //b// is good. The sequential form of the counterpoint justifies the somewhat too frequent octaves.
  
 **Ex. 15**: The leading-tone descends effectively at //a//. **Ex. 15**: The leading-tone descends effectively at //a//.
  • bridges_counterpoint/simple_counterpoint.1501157202.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2017/07/27 12:06
  • by brian