Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
cherubini_counterpoint_and_fugue:two_part_counterpoint:first_order [2018/06/14 03:23] – brian | cherubini_counterpoint_and_fugue:two_part_counterpoint:first_order [2018/08/11 17:03] – brian | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
In order to render the effect less harsh in the succession of these two chords -- as it is impossible to destroy it entirely -- a softening expedient of protraction must be found without employing other chords. The means are simple; it must be so managed, that the part which has struck the C-natural must cause the altered C to be heard. | In order to render the effect less harsh in the succession of these two chords -- as it is impossible to destroy it entirely -- a softening expedient of protraction must be found without employing other chords. The means are simple; it must be so managed, that the part which has struck the C-natural must cause the altered C to be heard. | ||
- | {{ : | + | {{ : |
{{ : | {{ : | ||
Line 156: | Line 156: | ||
This interval is visibly present, when the two sounds of which it is composed are to be heard one after the other in the two parts, and when the chords which contain them cannot belong to the same key, either by their nature or by the manner in which they succeed each other:-- | This interval is visibly present, when the two sounds of which it is composed are to be heard one after the other in the two parts, and when the chords which contain them cannot belong to the same key, either by their nature or by the manner in which they succeed each other:-- | ||
- | {{ : | + | {{ : |
{{ : | {{ : |